The Weightmans website would like to use cookies to store information on your computer to improve our website. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.

Newsletter

Commercial Property Focus - May 2009

Take a break

Read the lease carefully before you embark on a tenancy break

Break clauses have become very important in the current economic climate and tenants need to be aware that time limits to break the lease may be strict. This means that the operation of a tenancy break will require careful reading of the lease.

The recent case of Orchard (Developments) Holdings PLC v Reuters (2009) shows the problems that can happen when service of a notice is left to the last minute by fax. 

The tenants in this case had left the service of the break clause until the last minute and it needed to be served by the Saturday.  A process server delivered the letter on the Friday and copies were faxed on both the Friday and the Saturday.  It turned out that the letter had been posted to the wrong mailbox.  The issue then was whether the fax had amounted to service. The lease stated that “all applications, notifications, consents and approvals must be in writing unless the receiving party or its authorised agent acknowledged receipt; a notice is valid only if it is given by hand or sent by registered post or recorded delivery.”

The letter had not been served correctly, so the argument was whether the faxes were valid service (which were not a valid method of service unless acknowledged).  The landlord’s solicitor refused to acknowledge receipt and it was only 16 months later once proceedings had been issued that the landlord’s solicitor acknowledged that the faxes had been received.  The tenants argued that this acknowledgement had retrospectively validated the faxes and notices to break had now been served.  On appeal the court found that this notice had not been validly served as the acknowledgment had happened some time well after the break point and the consensus of the Judges views were that the lease did not oblige the landlord to acknowledge.  The court found it was impossible to acknowledge receipt some months after the break point.  The moral of the tale is that service of a break notice must follow the terms of the lease and any time limits must be strictly complied with.

This article first appeared in the Daily Post Viewpoint, published on 13 May 2009.

Sian Evans
Property Litigation Partner
Weightmans LLP
sian.evans@weightmans.com