HR Focus - February 2010
A very warm welcome to this month’s edition of HR Focus
This month, guidance has been given on
contingency fee agreements (arrangements where lawyers charge their
clients, usually Claimants, a fixed percentage of their eventual
compensation in exchange for representing them). New rules
set out the requirements for these agreements and cap the
percentage which lawyers can claim to 35%.
ACAS has published figures showing that its
pre-claim conciliation service is proving successful.
Employers who are in dispute with an employee can use a helpline to
get access to a conciliator who will then assist to resolve the
disputes. Evidence suggests that this approach significantly
reduces the likelihood of a claim being issued whether this is
because the dispute has been resolved or just because employees are
better informed about their chances.
If you have any comments, queries or questions
for our Q&A feature then please email askemployment@weightmans.com.
Alternatively, you can call Laura Kearsley, Editor on 0121 200
3480.
In this month’s edition:
Tribunals and whistle-blowing
Mandy Higgins, associate in the Liverpool
team discusses the new powers to be given to Tribunals to report
alleged wrong-doing to a relevant regulatory body.
Eweida v British Airways
Laura Kearsley, editor and
associate in the Midlands team reports on the recent Court of
Appeal decision in Eweida v British Airways, concerning the wearing
of religious jewellery at work.
Patel v Oldman MBC
The recent EAT decision in Patel v Oldman
MBC is one of those decisions in which one can see
the logic behind the EAT's thinking, but which is likely
to broaden rather the restrict the scope for
future argument: Mark Landon, partner
in the London team looks at a recent case which arguably adds
to the complexity surrounding whether an individual is disabled for
the purposes of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995.
Relationships in the workplace
In consideration of Valentine’s Day, Phil Pepper, associate in the Midlands team
considers the consequences for employers of office romances and
what employers can do to lessen any damage that these might have on
a business.
Question and Answer
And finally, in our regular Question and Answer
feature, Lesley Davison, Chartered MCIPD,
Human Resources Manager North, Viridor asks Kevin McKenna,
associate in the Manchester team “Can you give some clear direction
on "pooling" in redundancy situations?”.
This update does not attempt to provide a full
analysis of those matters with which it deals and is provided for
general information purposes only and is not intended to constitute
legal advice and should not be treated as a substitute for legal
advice. Weightmans LLP accepts no responsibility for any loss that
may arise from reliance on the information in this update. The
copyright in this update is owned by Weightmans.