Newsletters
31 July 2010

Local Government - November 2009


Welcome to the November edition of our newsletter for local and public authorities. 

This month’s newsletter looks at the LAML case and new legislation, access to information and the Veolia case, new powers to combat forced marriages, a member conduct decision about “respect”, the ability to seek a costs order against parents who had funded an unsuccessful claim against a school, case law on the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards and nearest relatives, the increase in child care applications, and a Court of Appeal decision on the application of TUPE.  We also include an employment law update and a digest of case law and new legislation in September and October 2009.

We would like to draw your special attention to a publication from the Department for Business Innovation and Skills.  It is a guide to a Code of Practice on Guidance.  We quote: “This Guide has been designed for use by officials in Government Departments and their Agencies when preparing guidance for business and the third sector on how to comply with legislation according to the rules in the Code of Practice on Guidance. It may also be useful for officials preparing guidance on best practice, or other forms of guidance.”  After 30 pages of guidance on guidance on guidance, it displays the DBIS strap line – “Making Life as Simple as Possible”.

Feature articles


The LAML case

Parliament debates a new power to establish insurance mutuals, but other uncertainties remain.  Graeme Creer reviews the wider implications of the Court of Appeal decision in Brent LBC v Risk Management Partners Ltd and London Authorities Mutual Limited & Harrow LBC.

Access to information

Does section 15 of the Audit Commission Act 1998 allow unfettered public access to confidential documents?  Graeme Creer comments on Veolia ES Nottinghamshire Ltd v Nottinghamshire County Council and (1) Shlomo Dowen & (2) Audit Commission for Local Authorities and The National Health Service In England.

Forced marriages

From the 1 November top tier and unitary local authorities can apply directly to the courts for an order prohibiting a forced marriage.  Catriona Sangster examines new guidance on “Multi-Agency Practice Guidelines: Handling Cases of Forced Marriage”.

Ethical Standards

An Appeals Tribunal decision that an email accusing an officer of “arrogance” was not disrespectful raises some difficult questions for Standards Committees.  Claire Lefort looks at the decision about Councillor Marc Cranfield-Adams of the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames.

Litigation – costs

A claimant unsuccessfully sought damages from his former school for failing to take appropriate steps to prevent him from being bullied.  Could the school recover its legal costs from his parents, who had funded the action?  Peter Wake looks at John Thomson v Berkhamsted Collegiate School.

Mental Health – deprivation of liberty

The Court of Protection has recently given judgment in the first DoLS case. Catriona Sangster considers this case in which the Court of Protection explained what makes a patient eligible for the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards where he or she might otherwise have been detained under the Mental Health Act.

Mental Health – nearest relative objection         

The High Court has decided that an earlier discharge by a nearest relative might itself count as an objection to a subsequent admission. David Hewitt considers the recently reported case of M v East London NHS Foundation Trust.

Child Care

The number of care applications for the three month period prior to September 2009 increased by nearly 50%.  Peter Wake reviews the implications as child protection systems come under ever increasing strain.

Employment – TUPE

If an employer mistakenly believes that TUPE does not apply to an outsourcing arrangement, and fails to consult, will there always be a breach of the Regulations?  Tim Lang comments on the Court of Appeal’s recent decision in CWU v Royal Mail Group.

Employment update

A driver claims unfair dismissal after a local authority requires a contractor to remove him from contact with children, advice on whistleblowing disclosures, the new vetting and barring scheme for people working with vulnerable groups, and how to protect your organisation from allegations of excessive pay offs.  Weightmans employment team offers an update on employment law issues.

Cases and legislation

We highlight new cases and legislation of interest to local authorities in September and October 2009.