The Weightmans website would like to use cookies to store information on your computer to improve our website. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our privacy policy.

Newsletters

Local Government - November 2009


Forced marriages

In 2008, over 1600 incidents of suspected forced marriage were reported to the Forced Marriage Unit, a section of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office. A forced marriage occurs where:

‘One or both spouses do not (or, in the case of some adults with learning or physical disabilities, cannot) consent to the marriage and duress is involved. Duress can include physical, psychological, financial, sexual and emotional pressure.’

Forced marriages understandably have a significant emotional impact upon those forced into the marriage. The issue of forced marriages is now subject to legislation; Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Act 2007. In some instances, forced marriages can lead to serious physical harm and indeed there is currently an ongoing criminal trial concerning the so called ‘honour killing’ of Tulay Guler.

The 2007 Act allows the Courts to make an Order prohibiting a forced marriage, to which a power of arrest may be attached. It sets out the factors that must be considered. There must be an application from the person concerned, from anyone else with the leave of the court, or from a “relevant third party”, or there must be related family proceedings. Under the Family Law Act1996 (Forced Marriage) (Relevant Third Party) Order 2009 top tier and unitary authorities local authorities are able to act as relevant third parties with effect from 1 November 2009.

Many local authorities may not appreciate that they have a role to play in this controversial and difficult topic. Clearly it may come into play in connection with the discharge of child protection, education and social care functions, but it is not limited to this area of work, and the issue may arise for example in the discharge of housing or community engagement functions. There is a risk that it will fall down one of the inter-departmental or inter-agency cracks.

In October 2009, the Ministry of Justice published ‘Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Act 2007: Guidance for Local Authorities as Relevant Third Party and Information Relevant to Multi-Agency Partnership Working.’ This is in addition to the publication in June 2009 of revised guidance spanning 105 pages entitled ‘Multi-Agency Practice Guidelines: Handling Cases of Forced Marriage.’ The publication of the recent guidance is timely as, from 1 November 2009, local authorities can make an application on behalf of a victim without the need to seek the leave of the court. In practical terms, this means the local authority need only complete form FL401A to make an application for a Forced Marriage Protection Order (FMPO) and no longer need to complete form FL430. The revised version of form FL401A is available from the Courts Service website.

Both guidance documents emphasise the importance of joint working and adopting a multi agency approach. In addition, the importance of applying a good dose of common sense and being alive to the possibility of forced marriages as not just a theoretical issue cannot be underestimated. Indeed, the multi agency guidance stresses the importance of the ‘one chance rule’:

‘All practitioners working with victims of forced marriage and honour-based violence need to be aware of the “one chance” rule. That is, they may only have one chance to speak to a potential victim and thus they may only have one chance to save a life. This means that all practitioners working within statutory agencies need to be aware of their responsibilities and obligations when they come across forced marriage cases. If the victim is allowed to walk out of the door without support being offered, that one chance might be wasted.’

The October 2009 guidance is aimed at all caseworkers and legal advisers who deal with safeguarding children and protecting vulnerable adults. In addition, those working within education and housing departments should also be made aware of the guidance.

The recently published guidance details possible warning signs of forced marriage that people should be aware of and provides some useful ‘do’s and don’ts’:

  • ‘always take the issue seriously and recognise the potential risk of very significant harm to the victim: many professionals find it hard to believe the lengths that families go to in order to force a marriage and that families do kill in the name of honour. Young people are regularly told that an elderly relative is dying in order to persuade them to leave the country;
  • see them on their own in a private place where the conversation cannot be overheard;
  • gather as much information as possible about the victim – it may be the only opportunity;
  • remind them of their rights i.e. that they have the right to enter into marriage with their full and free consent and the right to make decisions about their lives; and
  • discuss the case with the Forced Marriage Unit on 0207 008 0151

Do not:

  • send the victim away and dismiss the allegation of forced marriage as a domestic issue;
  • inform the victim’s family, friends or members of the community that the victim has sought help; or
  • attempt to be a mediator (see sections 3.10 and 9.1 of the multi-agency guidance on the dangers of family mediation).’

The guidance recommends that localised check lists are developed for front line staff and that caseworkers should, in all cases of potential forced marriages, speak to their legal departments in order that the full range of legal remedies can be considered. In addition, the guidance ‘strongly recommends’ that local authorities forge links with local schools, health services, the police and the voluntary sector so a local system for referrals, support and response can be developed. Information sharing and referral protocols need to be implemented between all the various departments and agencies involved. The guidance also includes a useful summary of how to make a Forced Marriage Protection Order application, both with or without notice to the respondents and lists the courts which have staff and judges specially trained to deal with the applications.

The October guidance provides a useful abridged version of some of the issues that need to be considered and the legal steps that can be taken but should not be seen as shortcut for reading the ‘Multi-Agency Practice Guidelines: Handling Cases of Forced Marriage.’ Local authorities need to take their role in preventing forced marriages seriously and should not adopt a view that ‘it doesn’t happen in our area’. Local authorities need to be alive to the issue of forced marriages and the different contexts in which they can appear, for example in relation to teenage girls/boys or adults lacking capacity.

Catriona Sangster, Paralegal
Weightmans LLP