12 May 2008

Disease – November 2007

This edition includes our regular asbestos update; an update on the progress of the deafness test cases;...

...the practical effect of the 2005 Noise at Work Regulations in relation to the leisure sector; obtaining alternative expert evidence;  DNA testing; stress and protection from harassment and our regular review of trends and what is on the horizon                

Industrial Deafness.

As one door seems to be closing, another opens to potential claims for noise induced hearing loss.  Jim Byard Partner in Weightmans Dedicated Disease Unit in Leicester provides an update on the Nottingham textile deafness test litigation and comments upon the duty imposed on the leisure and entertainment industry by the Noise at Work Regulations 2005 in the run up to the crucial April 2008 date.  

Asbestos update

The long awaited judgment in the pleural plaques appeals was handed down by the House of Lords on the 24 October 2007. Graham Dean and Kieran Jones Partners in the DDU in Liverpool comment on this decision and Judith Peters Partner in the DDU also in Liverpool reports on Cameron v Vinters Defence Systems Ltd . Gloria Ginvert Partner in the DDU In Leicester provides a  round up of other asbestos related issues.

Medical experts - all change

In our last newsletter, we warned of an attempt by Claimant’s solicitors to change their medical expert.  In this issue Gloria Ginvert Partner in the DDU in Leicester looks a little closer at situations where a party is likely to be given permission to obtain alternative expert evidence. 

DNA testing to prove exposure?

Scientists in the USA maintain they have developed a technique for testing DNA which identifies if an individual health has been damaged by exposure to harmful substances.  Kieran Jones Partner and head of Weightmans DDU and Kath Potter Solicitor in DDU Birmingham comment upon how such tests have been used in the States and the potential effect upon disease litigation in England and Wales.

Stress

In Conn v Sunderland City Council the Court of Appeal have provided their first guidance on what constitutes harassment under the Protection of Harassment Act 1997 since Majrowski.  Roddy Macleod, Partner in Weightmans Manchester comments.

Trends

What is on the horizon in terms of conditions which could result in compensation claims in the future?   Gloria Ginvert Partner Leicester DDU and Kieran Jones Partner DDU comment upon occupational cancers, and possible links between mobile phones and the risk of brain cancer and upon the HSE’s latest campaign.

 

We hope that you find our bulletin informative and practical and we would welcome feedback on ways in which we can ensure that the bulletin best meets your needs.  The Bulletin’s editor is Kieran Jones, who can be contacted at: kieran.jones@weightmans.com

This update does not attempt to provide a full analysis of those matters with which it deals and is provided for general information purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice and should not be treated as a substitute for legal advice. Weightmans LLP accepts no responsibility for any loss that may arise from reliance on the information in this update. The copyright in this update is owned by Weightmans LLP.