Newsletter
21 November 2008

Police - June 2008

 

This edition contains an update on the case of Van Colle v Hertfordshire Constabulary following the recent House of Lords hearing.

......Articles on the controversial issue of police officers sitting as Jurors, The Corporate Manslaughter and Homicide Act 2007 , the question of anonymity for firearms officers at Inquests, the recent decision of the EAT in the case of West Midlands Police v Blackburn and one other, the latest novel use of the Anti Social Behaviour Legislation, trips and slips and data protection. 

Van Colle v The Chief Constable of Hertfordshire Constabulary

The House of Lords heard the appeal by Hertfordshire Constabulary between 19 and 23 May 2008.   Mark Whitaker who acted for Hertfordshire Constabulary highlights the main issues arising. 

Do Police Officers make biased Jurors 

The Court of Appeal in the case of R v Khan & Others considered whether police officers could be considered to be unbiased Jurors.  Hannah Pooley comments on their findings. 

Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 

The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 have introduced a new criminal offence.   David Lewis of Weightmans Dedicated Regulatory Services Team looks at the Act and what it means to the Police Service. David will be speaking further on this subject at the Weightmans Conference at Eastwood Hall Nottingham on 22/23 September 2008.

When can an application for anonymity be properly made at an Inquest?

At a recent pre - Inquest hearing the Coroner for North Staffordshire made an order granting full anonymity to four firearms officers who had been in attendance at the scene of a fatal shooting.  Martin Forshaw who acted on behalf of Staffordshire Constabulary identifies the salient points of the Coroner’s decision.

Equal Pay – Discriminatory bonus justified

The EAT has held that a bonus scheme designed to award police officers working at night was an appropriate and necessary means of achieving the legitimate aim of rewarding working anti social hours, despite the scheme adversely affecting women.  Jawaid Rehman, Head of Weightmans Equal Pay Forum looks at the recent decision in the Chief Constable of West Midlands Police v Blackburn & one other. 

Anti Social Behaviour Orders, ASBO given for breach of existing restraining order – a legal first?

Is this a legal first?  Belinda Moore looks at a case where a man who breached a restraining order received an Anti Social Behaviour Order banning him from living and sleeping in his own home.

Litigation – Don’t trip yourself on Regulation 12.1

Trips and slips and work can lead to civil claims.   Saul Burton looks at the unreported case of Sims v Hertfordshire County Council and considers the obligation placed upon employers by Regulation 12 (1) and 12 (2) of the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992. 

Data Protection, Loss or Improper Disclosure of Personal Data – damages for victims and penalties for transgressors

Missing discs and stolen laptops are big news, but what are the real risks?  Simon Charlton looks at damages claims and the penalties the Information Commissioner can impose for breaches of the Data Protection Act

We hope that you find our bulletin informative and practical and we would welcome feedback on ways in which we can ensure that the bulletin best meets your needs.  The Bulletin’s editor is Martin Forshaw, Head of the National Police Team who can be contacted at: martin.forshaw@weightmans.com

This update does not attempt to provide a full analysis of those matters with which it deals and is provided for general information purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice and should not be treated as a substitute for legal advice. Weightmans LLP accepts no responsibility for any loss that may arise from reliance on the information in this update. The copyright in this update is owned by Weightmans.