Ethical standards clinic
Hearings in private
In the pre-hearing stage, the subject member has made a request
to hold the hearing in private. How should I respond as no reasons
have been given as to why the request should be made in private and
the Chairman is adamant the hearing take place in public? Click here to read the answer to this
question.
Adjourning hearings
The subject member has told me that the date of the hearing is
inconvenient and asked for an adjournment. No grounds have been
given for the adjournment, so what should I do? Click here to read the answer to this
question.
Committees - political balance
I’m setting up arrangements for the standards committee hearing
and the chair of the Committee has asked whether the Committee
needs to be politically balanced when holding hearings. What advice
should I give him? Click here to read
the answer to this question.
Questions to the investigator
I have received a letter from the subject member in which he
demands to question the investigating officer about their report,
as he considers that it is totally inaccurate. What should I
do? Click here to read the answer to
this question.
Leader representative
The subject member confirms that the Leader of the Council will
be representing him at the hearing. The Chairperson of the
Standards Committee objects to this on the basis that he finds the
Leader intimidating as she holds a powerful position, and he has
previously had a poor relationship with her. What advice should I
give to the Leader and the Chairperson? Click here to read the answer to this
question.
Member's interest
Does the subject member have a prejudicial interest at the
hearing which is determining their conduct? If so, can they take
advantage of paragraph 12(2) which allows a member with a
prejudicial interest to speak, answer questions or make
representations before leaving the room. Click here to read the answer to this
question.
Compelling witnesses
I have carried out several interviews with potential witnesses
about the conduct of a member alleged to have breached the code of
conduct. There is one witness I wish to interview who refuses to
co-operate with me. What powers do I have to compel the witness to
be interviewed? Click here to read the
answer to this question.
Police investigation
I have just received an allegation for investigation that a
member was drunk and threatened a member of the public at a Council
meeting. The subject member has contacted me to say that my
investigation is illegal because he is already being investigated
by the Police and that my investigation will simply repeat that
being undertaken by the Police. What should I do with my
investigation? Click here to read the
answer to this question.
Postponing investigation
I have completed my investigation and prepared a draft report
which I intend to send to the subject member for her comments. She
has called me today to tell me that she will be going into hospital
for surgery and her doctor advised her to avoid any stressful
situations before, during and after her hospital treatment for at
least 6 months. She therefore said that she will not have any
further dealings with me over the investigation about her conduct.
What should I do? Click here to read
the answer to this question.
SBE review
Under the new framework, the Standards Committee can refer the
complaint received to the Standards Board for England (SBE). The
SBE can decide to refer the complaint to an ethical standards
officer, refer it back to the Standards Committee, or decide that
no action can be taken. Is there a right of appeal by either the
Standards Committee or the complainant against this
decision? Click here to read the answer
to this question.
New ethical framework
What issues should the Standards Committee consider now so as to
prepare for the implementation of the new ethical
framework? Click here to read the
answer to this question.
Complainant right to speak
The complainant has requested that they be allowed to speak at
the hearing. What should I tell the complainant? Click here to read the answer to this
question.
Heckling at hearings
At the Standards Committee hearing, there are a significant
number of members of the public present who are noisy and appear to
be disruptive to the proceedings. During the submissions given by
the Investigator, some members of the public begin to heckle the
Investigator, and it becomes difficult to hear the submissions
being made. What steps can be taken in these
circumstances? Click here to read the
answer to this question.
Stolen document
At the hearing, the subject member challenges the jurisdiction
of the Committee in being able to hear the case because she
considers that the document supporting the complaint was stolen
from her. How should the Committee respond? Click here to read the answer to this
question.
Recording hearings
At the hearing which concerns the conduct of a high profile
member, a journalist requests to tape record or film the
proceedings. What advice should I give to the
Committee? Click here to read the
answer to this question.
Decision notices
The Standards Committee announce orally their decision at the
end of the hearing. The subject member asks whether she will
receive written confirmation of the decision. What should the
Committee provide in writing to the subject member? Click here to read the answer to this
question.
Appeals
The subject member has appealed the Standards Committee’s
decision. The Chairman wants to know whether the Committee should
take part in the appeal proceedings. Click here to read the answer to this
question.