Conviction for attempted £2.3 million insurance claim
A man who exaggerated his injuries and attempted to claim
millions of pounds in compensation has today received a prison
sentence in the Royal Courts of Justice, London after his deception
through the legal process was uncovered and he was found in
contempt of court.
Michael Richards, 31, was involved in a tragic car accident in
2004, which resulted in two fatalities. Subsequently he attempted
to mislead medical and legal professionals and the Motor Insurers’
Bureau (MIB) about the scale and nature of his injuries. Mr
Richards attempted to claim £2.3million in compensation from MIB by
exaggerating his injuries and the effects on him. The court was
shown evidence that Mr Richards had attempted to deceive
professionals and family members for a sustained period of time
about the severity of his injuries.
Ashton West, Chief Executive at MIB said: “MIB is a not for
profit organisation that exists to support genuine claims from
innocent victims that have sustained injuries caused by uninsured
or untraced drivers. The attempt to claim money under false
pretences was one driven by greed. This judgment sends a strong
message that MIB, the insurance industry, courts and public will
not tolerate false or fraudulent claims and these cases will be
pursued with vigour.”
Mr Richards suffered head and orthopaedic injuries in the
accident which killed two individuals in Milton Keynes in 2004.
As his compensation case progressed through the legal system, Mr
Richards puzzled medical professionals as he presented himself as
almost mute and incoherent. MIB instructed Weightmans LLP to advise
and assist with investigations into what was being presented as a
very large and complex claim. The investigation included
surveillance of Richards’ residence and reviewing his police
records.
Mike Pope, a partner at Weightmans LLP explains, “In 2009, Mr
Richards was arrested in connection with other matters and this
revealed Mr Richards speaking to the officers normally while under
questioning, and without any assistance from a carer. Furthermore,
the address provided by Mr Richards to the officers as his home
address was completely different to the council property he had
quoted when making his claim. When the new address was put under
surveillance we quickly amassed footage of him living a completely
normal life, working out at the gym, talking normally and driving a
car.”
Weightmans LLP demonstrated that this new evidence was
significant to determining the true level of his disability and
advised MIB in the defence of the personal injury claim and later
in bringing the contempt of court action.
MIB released its evidence and shortly after, in February 2010,
Mr Richards’ claim for compensation was withdrawn. Later in 2010,
MIB initiated contempt of court proceedings against Mr Richards,
his sister Serina Richards and his foster father for their part in
the deception.
Serina Richards was complicit in making a statement about
Richards condition which she knew to be untrue and for assisting
with the deception when accompanying Richards in medical
examinations as part of the legal claim process. Richards’ foster
father signed a witness statement attesting to the extent of his
brain damage which he knew was not true.
Today at the Royal Courts of Justice in London, President of the
Queen’s Bench Division Lord Justice Thomas and Mr Justice Wyn
Williams sentenced Mr Richards to four months in prison. His sister
Serina Richards was sentenced to 14 days. Richards’ foster father,
Terence Bassnett, received a 14 day sentence suspended for six
months.
“This is a significant and complex case that revealed multiple
deceptions. The case required the expert eyes of both the legal
team and the claims handlers at the MIB to gather all the evidence
of fraud over a protracted period of time,” Mr Pope said.
“Today’s judgment sends out a clear warning to dishonest
claimants that the courts will not tolerate them – and that they
won’t find a safe haven in high value claims.
“Mr Richards was determined to defraud MIB, and therefore all
honest premium paying motorists, out of £2.3 million, so this
contempt of court action was absolutely vital. Now more than ever,
the public purse must be protected against opportunistic and
organised fraudsters – and this is what the courts have done
today.”